
Walk into any shop, hire any service, move any goods across a state border, and GST is already in the transaction.
Over 1.5 crore businesses actively file under the system, and collections crossed Rs. 22 lakh crore in FY 2024-25.
Despite that scale, the GST structure in India still trips people up, particularly when CGST, SGST, and IGST appear on the same invoice with no explanation of why.
Here is how it all fits together
The structure of GST is a destination-based indirect tax: every point in the supply chain collects it, but only the final consumer actually pays.
An invoice-linked credit system handles the difference at each stage.
Explaining the structure of GST in India comes down to two questions on any transaction: which of the four components applies, and at what rate. Where the goods go and what they are determine both answers.

GST replaced 17 major taxes and 13 cesses that were in place simultaneously before 2017.
A business selling across states dealt with central excise at dispatch, state VAT at the destination, and entry taxes at every border crossing in between. GST collapsed that entire structure.
India's GST structure gives neither the Centre nor the states exclusive collection authority. Both are collected simultaneously on the same transaction, which is what makes it a dual model.
On intra-state sales, two taxes apply at once: one Centre, one state, both on the same transaction value.
In interstate sales, a single integrated tax replaces both, and the Centre shares the destination state's cut after collection.
GST is destination-based, so consuming states receive the revenue rather than producing states. The Centre runs CGST and IGST.
Each state runs its own SGST. Rate changes need Council consensus, not unilateral action by either side.
Four components make up the GST structure in India, each covering a specific transaction type.
Whenever a sale occurs within a single state, the Central Government collects its share through CGST.
A printer supplier in Pune selling to a Pune-based firm pays CGST on that invoice. The money goes to the Centre, not the state.
The state collects SGST on that same transaction, at the same rate. Both CGST and SGST are recorded on a single invoice, calculated on the same value, but deposited into completely separate accounts. Maharashtra keeps its SGST.
The Centre keeps its CGST. Neither touches the other's share.
Once goods or a service cross a state border, CGST and SGST drop off the invoice entirely. IGST replaces both, collected by the Centre at the combined rate.
A Pune supplier invoicing a Hyderabad buyer charges IGST only. The Centre later credits Telangana's portion through its settlement process.
Territories like Chandigarh and Lakshadweep have no state government to collect SGST. UTGST fills that gap, same rate, same logic, just administered by the Centre on the territory's behalf instead.
| Component | Who Collects | Transaction Type | Revenue Destination |
| CGST | Central Government | Intra-state | Centre |
| SGST | State Government | Intra-state | State |
| IGST | Central Government | Inter-state, imports | Center then shared |
| UTGST | Centre for UT | Intra-UT | Union Territory |
At the 56th GST Council meeting in September 2025, India overhauled its rate structure under GST 2.0. Four slabs became two. Here is what each category covers.
Fresh vegetables, milk, eggs, education, and healthcare. These either attract no GST or fall entirely outside the tax net.
The merit rate. Daily essentials, agricultural goods, and healthcare equipment sit here to keep consumer costs down.
GST 2.0 eliminated this slab entirely. Items previously here have been shifted to either 5% or 18% based on classification.
The standard rate. Financial services, IT, telecom, restaurants, and most consumer goods fall under 18%.
A 40% rate now replaces the 28% slab for premium vehicles, tobacco, and aerated beverages. The compensation cess winds down as state transition guarantees expire.
Also Read: What is CGST & SGST? Key Differences Between Them
One question drives everything about GST structure in practice: does the supply stay within one state or cross a border?
Both CGST and SGST apply equally. A Rs. 10,000 sale in Mumbai at 18% GST results in Rs. 900 CGST being paid to the Centre and Rs. 900 SGST to Maharashtra.
Only IGST appears on the invoice. The Centre collects everything, then credits the destination state's portion through settlement.
A Surat fabric trader sells Rs. 50,000 of material to a Bengaluru manufacturer at 5%. The Centre collects IGST of Rs. 2,500 and credits Karnataka's share.
Had the buyer been in Surat, CGST and SGST of Rs. 1,250 each would have applied instead.
Remove ITC from the GST structure, and the whole system becomes a turnover tax, taxing prices that already carry embedded tax from the previous stage.
When a business pays GST on purchases, that amount becomes a credit. The business offsets it against the GST it collects on sales and only deposits the difference.
A manufacturer pays 18% GST on raw materials. Without ITC, that tax is embedded in the product price. The next buyer pays 18% again on a price that already carries the first 18%. ITC removes that overlap entirely.
Check your Hero FinCorp personal loan eligibility here if working capital gaps are putting pressure on operations.
Also Read: Working Capital Loan: Meaning, Eligibility and 2026 Application Guide
The GST Council makes every significant call on the GST structure in India: rates, exemptions, thresholds, and compliance rules.
The Union Finance Minister chairs it. Every state Finance Minister sits as a member. States hold two-thirds of the voting weight; the Centre holds one-third.

GST cut logistics costs across India by over 33% by removing state border checkpoints and the documentation burden that goods trucks faced at every crossing.
One portal replaced parallel VAT, excise, and service tax filings. By June 2025, 1.53 crore taxpayers were actively using the GST network, supported by e-invoicing and e-way bills.
Every ITC claim links to a seller's outward supply declaration, so mismatches are automatically detected. GST collections peaked at Rs. 2.36 lakh crore in April 2025, the highest monthly figure ever recorded.
Exports attract zero GST with ITC refunds on inputs. The Hero Digital Lending & UPI App on Google Play and the App Store supports businesses that need quick funds while meeting GST obligations.
Classification disputes between slabs continue to generate litigation and compliance uncertainty, especially for products near category boundaries.
Small businesses feel GST compliance differently from large ones. The compliance design has not caught up with the reality of who is actually doing the filing.
Each Council meeting can change rates or compliance rules on short notice. Businesses across multiple product categories incur real, ongoing costs to track and implement every update.
The August 2025 reform announcement focused on three areas: structural reform, rate rationalisation, and ease of doing business. Removing the 12% and 28% slabs and introducing the 40% demerit rate was the biggest single change to the GST structure in India since 2017.
The administration is pushing pre-filled returns, AI reconciliation tools, faster refund cycles, and stricter e-invoicing thresholds forward simultaneously.
On the dispute side, the GST Appellate Tribunal finally gives taxpayers somewhere to take a grievance that is not immediately a high court petition, which, for most businesses, was simply not a realistic option cost-wise
GST is not a simple tax, and anyone who tells you otherwise has probably never filed a return or disputed a classification.
The structure of GST in India comprises four components: handling different transaction types, a credit mechanism that prevents tax from stacking at every stage, and a Council that negotiates every rate change through weighted consensus.
GST 2.0 trimmed the slabs. Digital tools are chipping away at the paperwork. It is still not perfect, but understanding how the pieces connect makes navigating it considerably less painful.
The structure of GST in India is a dual indirect tax system where the Centre and states both collect on the same intra-state transaction simultaneously.
CGST is what the Centre collects on intra-state supplies. SGST is what the state collects on those same transactions. IGST is what the Centre collects on inter-state sales and imports before sharing the destination state's cut. UTGST mirrors SGST but covers union territories that lack their own legislature.
Both apply to the same intra-state transaction at identical rates. The difference is where the money lands. CGST revenue accrues to the Centre; SGST accrues to the state. On an 18% invoice, the 9% CGST and 9% SGST appear as separate line items but the buyer pays both at the point of sale.
IGST applies to imports and interstate transactions. Whenever a supplier and a buyer sit in different states, IGST is the only GST on that invoice. The Centre collects everything and then credits the consuming state's portion through the settlement process.
The dual GST model gives both the Centre and the states the authority to levy and collect GST on the same supply at the same time. Within a state, CGST and SGST both appear. Across state lines, only IGST applies, and the Centre redistributes accordingly.
GST 2.0 set the two main slabs at 5% for essential goods and 18% for most goods and services. A 40% rate now covers luxury and sin goods, replacing the old 28% slab and compensation cess arrangement.
ITC stops tax from compounding at every stage of the supply chain. Without it, each buyer pays GST on a price that already carries GST paid upstream, which is what the old regime produced. With ITC, each business deducts the amount it paid for inputs from the amount it collects on outputs. Only the net value added at each stage is taxed, keeping the actual burden on the final consumer rather than invisibly building through every production step.
Disclaimer: The information provided in this blog post is intended for informational purposes only. The content is based on research and opinions available at the time of writing. While we strive to ensure accuracy, we do not claim to be exhaustive or definitive. Readers are advised to independently verify any details mentioned here, such as specifications, features, and availability, before making any decisions. Hero FinCorp does not take responsibility for any discrepancies, inaccuracies, or changes that may occur after the publication of this blog. The choice to rely on the information presented herein is at the reader's discretion, and we recommend consulting official sources and experts for the most up-to-date and accurate information about the featured products.

Clearing your loan repayments is an important financial milestone. But there is one more document that helps officially close the loop: a loan NOC. Many borrowers overlook it, even though this certificate can help maintain accurate records and avoid issues in the future.

Missing an EMI payment can happen for many reasons, like a sudden expense, a delayed salary, simply forgetting a due date, etc. But when a repayment is not made on time, it may become an overdue loan.

A lot of borrowers hear "your loan has been written off" and assume the debt is gone. It is not.